CMMC vs SOC 2: Decision Guide - Which Compliance Framework Do You Need?
Expert decision framework to determine whether your organization should pursue CMMC, SOC 2, or both certifications. Evaluate your business profile, customer base, and compliance requirements to make the right choice.
Need Help With CMMC Compliance?
Our experts can help you implement these strategies in your organization. Get a free consultation today.
Executive Summary
Choosing between CMMC and SOC 2 is one of the most critical compliance decisions organizations face. The wrong choice wastes 6-18 months and $50K-$500K pursuing a certification that doesn’t serve your business goals. This guide provides a structured decision framework to help you evaluate your business profile, customer requirements, and industry characteristics to select the optimal compliance path.
Key Decision Factors
- Contract requirements: Government vs commercial customers
- Data handling: CUI/FCI vs customer data
- Industry: Defense contractors vs service providers
- Market position: Current vs future customer base
- Timeline constraints: Immediate needs vs strategic positioning
Understanding the Stakes
Before diving into the decision framework, it’s critical to understand what’s at stake. CMMC and SOC 2 serve fundamentally different purposes:
CMMC is a mandatory cybersecurity standard for Department of Defense contractors. Without CMMC certification, you cannot bid on or maintain DoD contracts that handle Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI). It’s not optional if you want to participate in the $800+ billion defense market.
SOC 2 is a voluntary compliance framework that demonstrates your organization’s commitment to protecting customer data. While technically optional, it has become a de facto requirement for SaaS companies and service providers selling to enterprise B2B customers. Without SOC 2, you’ll face extended sales cycles, legal roadblocks, and lost deals.
Pursuing the wrong framework means you’ve invested significant time and resources without achieving your business objectives. Conversely, the right choice accelerates revenue, opens new markets, and strengthens your security posture.
Decision Framework: 5 Critical Questions
Question 1: Do You Have Current or Pending DoD Contracts?
If YES to any of these:
- Direct prime contractor with DoD
- Subcontractor at any tier handling CUI
- Pending DoD contract proposals
- Defense supply chain participation
- DFARS clause in current contracts
Decision: CMMC is mandatory. This isn’t a choice. If you handle CUI for DoD contracts, CMMC Level 2 is required by 2025-2026. Without it, you cannot maintain or bid on those contracts.
Next steps:
- Prioritize CMMC implementation immediately
- Assess whether SOC 2 provides additional commercial value
- Consider unified approach if serving both markets
If NO: Proceed to Question 2.
Question 2: What Type of Data Do You Handle?
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI):
- Export-controlled technical data
- Critical infrastructure information
- Procurement information
- Law enforcement sensitive data
- Any information marked CUI
Decision: CMMC required. Even if you’re not currently a defense contractor, handling CUI obligates CMMC compliance. This includes research institutions, technology providers, and consultants working with government agencies.
Customer Data (PII, PHI, Financial):
- Personal identifiable information
- Health records
- Payment card data
- Business confidential information
- Proprietary customer data
Decision: SOC 2 strongly recommended. Enterprise customers increasingly require SOC 2 reports before signing contracts, especially for SaaS platforms, payment processors, and data storage services.
If you handle both: Proceed to Question 4 (dual compliance consideration).
If neither: Your compliance needs may be different. Consider ISO 27001, HIPAA, or PCI DSS based on your specific industry.
Question 3: Who Are Your Target Customers?
Analyze your customer base across current and future (12-24 month) horizons:
Primary Market: Government/Defense:
- Department of Defense agencies
- Defense prime contractors
- Defense subcontractors
- Other federal agencies
- State/local government (defense-related)
Decision: CMMC priority. Your market access depends on CMMC certification. Budget 6-18 months and $100K-$500K for Level 2 implementation and assessment.
Primary Market: Commercial B2B SaaS:
- Enterprise software customers
- Mid-market businesses
- Technology companies
- Financial services firms
- Healthcare organizations
Decision: SOC 2 priority. SOC 2 Type II has become table stakes for SaaS vendors. Expect 60-80% of enterprise prospects to request SOC 2 reports during security reviews. Budget 9-15 months and $50K-$200K.
Primary Market: Small Business/Consumer:
- Small business customers (< 50 employees)
- Direct-to-consumer products
- Retail customers
- Non-enterprise B2B
Decision: Neither may be required initially. Focus on basic security hygiene, privacy compliance (GDPR, CCPA), and industry-specific requirements. Reconsider as you move upmarket.
Mixed Market (Government + Commercial): Proceed to Question 4.
Question 4: Should You Pursue Both Certifications?
Dual compliance makes sense when you answer YES to multiple questions:
Market Coverage:
- Serving both government and commercial customers
- Planning market expansion into defense sector
- Commercial SaaS with government potential
- Defense contractor diversifying revenue
Control Overlap Efficiency: CMMC and SOC 2 share approximately 50-60% of security controls:
- Access control and authentication
- Encryption and data protection
- Logging and monitoring
- Incident response procedures
- Vulnerability management
- Risk assessments
- Security awareness training
Cost-Benefit Analysis:
Approach | First Year Cost | Timeline | Benefit |
---|---|---|---|
CMMC Only | $100K-$500K | 6-12 months | DoD market access |
SOC 2 Only | $50K-$200K | 9-15 months | Commercial trust |
Sequential (separate) | $150K-$700K | 15-27 months | Both markets |
Unified (shared controls) | $120K-$450K | 12-18 months | 30-40% savings |
Decision: Pursue both with unified approach if:
- You need access to both markets within 24 months
- Your budget supports $120K+ investment
- You can dedicate internal resources to compliance
- The combined revenue opportunity justifies costs
Implementation sequence:
- Implement shared controls first (60% of total work)
- Layer in SOC 2-specific operational controls
- Add CMMC-specific technical requirements
- Schedule assessments 3-6 months apart
Question 5: What Are Your Timeline and Budget Constraints?
Immediate Need (< 6 months):
- Active contract requirements
- Pending deal contingent on certification
- Compliance deadline in contract
Reality check: Neither CMMC nor SOC 2 can be properly implemented in under 6 months from zero baseline. You face three options:
- Negotiate extension: Request 6-12 month compliance timeline
- Gap remediation: Focus on critical gaps only (risky)
- Delay contract: Postpone until properly certified
Warning: Rushing compliance implementation creates significant risk. Inadequate controls lead to audit findings, failed assessments, and potential breaches. Budget realistic timelines.
Strategic Positioning (12-24 months):
- Building competitive advantage
- Preparing for market expansion
- Proactive compliance posture
Recommended approach:
- Conduct gap assessment (1-2 months)
- Implement controls systematically (6-12 months)
- Internal audit and remediation (2-3 months)
- External assessment (1-3 months)
Budget Constraints:
Limited budget (< $75K):
- Start with SOC 2 Type I (cheaper, faster)
- Focus on critical security controls
- Use fractional vCISO for implementation
- Upgrade to Type II after revenue growth
Moderate budget ($75K-$200K):
- SOC 2 Type II full implementation
- CMMC Level 2 with internal resources
- Choose based on customer requirements
Substantial budget (> $200K):
- Dual compliance unified approach
- External consultants for implementation
- Comprehensive tool/platform investment
- Faster timeline with dedicated resources
Industry-Specific Guidance
Defense Contractors
Priority: CMMC Level 2 (mandatory) Timeline: Start immediately, 12-18 month runway Secondary: Consider SOC 2 if pursuing commercial products Key risk: Contract loss if not certified by deadline
SaaS Providers
Priority: SOC 2 Type II (market requirement) Timeline: Pre-Series A or when selling to enterprise Secondary: CMMC only if pursuing GovTech Key risk: Extended sales cycles without SOC 2
Cybersecurity Firms
Priority: Both (credibility requirement) Timeline: 12-18 months unified approach Strategy: Leverage controls for competitive advantage Key risk: Lack of certification undermines sales credibility
Cloud/Infrastructure Providers
Priority: SOC 2 Type II (customer requirement) Timeline: Early-stage, before major enterprise deals Secondary: CMMC if serving defense/government Key risk: Cannot close enterprise deals without SOC 2
IT Consultancies
Priority: Depends on client base (see Question 3) Timeline: As clients request Strategy: Build incrementally based on demand Key risk: Over-investing in unused certification
Common Decision Mistakes
Mistake 1: Pursuing SOC 2 for DoD Contracts
Why it fails: DoD explicitly requires CMMC for CUI handling. SOC 2 provides zero value for defense contracts.
Correct approach: CMMC is non-negotiable for DoD. If pursuing both markets, add SOC 2 after CMMC baseline.
Mistake 2: Pursuing CMMC for SaaS Sales
Why it fails: Commercial customers don’t recognize CMMC. They want SOC 2 reports for vendor risk assessments.
Correct approach: SOC 2 is the commercial standard. CMMC provides no sales advantage outside defense.
Mistake 3: Delaying Decision Until Contract Requires It
Why it fails: 12-18 month implementation timeline means lost contracts and revenue during buildout.
Correct approach: Proactive compliance positioning. Start implementation 18-24 months before anticipated customer requirements.
Mistake 4: Choosing Based on Lower Cost
Why it fails: Compliance must align with business objectives. The cheaper option that doesn’t serve your market is wasted investment.
Correct approach: Choose based on customer requirements and revenue opportunity, then budget appropriately.
Mistake 5: Assuming Existing Security = Quick Certification
Why it fails: Both frameworks require specific evidence, documentation, and operational maturity beyond technical controls.
Correct approach: Conduct professional gap assessment before estimating timeline or budget.
Your Decision Roadmap
Step 1: Assess Current State (Week 1-2)
- Identify contract requirements (current + pipeline)
- Analyze data types handled (CUI vs customer data)
- Map current customer base and 12-month targets
- Review existing security controls and documentation
- Estimate budget availability
Step 2: Conduct Gap Assessment (Month 1-2)
- Hire qualified consultant or assessor
- Perform technical control evaluation
- Review policies and procedures
- Identify critical gaps
- Estimate implementation timeline and costs
Step 3: Make Strategic Decision (Month 2)
- Evaluate findings against decision framework
- Calculate ROI for each option (CMMC, SOC 2, both)
- Align with business strategy and revenue goals
- Secure executive buy-in and budget
- Define success criteria
Step 4: Execute Implementation Plan (Month 3-12)
- Prioritize shared controls if pursuing both
- Implement technical security controls
- Develop policies and procedures
- Train staff and conduct awareness
- Build evidence collection processes
Step 5: Prepare for Assessment (Month 10-12)
- Conduct internal audit
- Remediate identified gaps
- Organize documentation and evidence
- Select C3PAO (CMMC) or CPA firm (SOC 2)
- Schedule formal assessment
The Overlap Opportunity
If your decision framework points toward both CMMC and SOC 2, understanding the control overlap is critical for optimizing your investment.
Shared Control Domains (50-60% overlap):
Access Control:
- Multi-factor authentication
- Least privilege principle
- User access reviews
- Password requirements
- Session management
Encryption:
- Data at rest encryption
- Data in transit protection
- Cryptographic key management
- Certificate management
Logging and Monitoring:
- Security event logging
- Log retention policies
- Security monitoring
- Audit log protection
Incident Response:
- Incident response plan
- Detection capabilities
- Communication procedures
- Lessons learned process
Vulnerability Management:
- Vulnerability scanning
- Patch management
- Penetration testing
- Risk remediation
Risk Assessment:
- Annual risk assessments
- Threat identification
- Control evaluation
- Risk treatment plans
Security Awareness:
- Training programs
- Phishing simulations
- Security policies
- Role-based training
Implementation Strategy:
-
Phase 1 - Shared Foundation (Months 1-6):
- Implement controls that satisfy both frameworks
- Build unified GRC platform
- Develop integrated policies
- Establish monitoring infrastructure
-
Phase 2 - CMMC-Specific (Months 4-8):
- Configuration management
- Media protection controls
- Physical security requirements
- System integrity monitoring
-
Phase 3 - SOC 2-Specific (Months 6-10):
- Availability monitoring
- Processing integrity controls
- Privacy requirements
- Change management documentation
-
Phase 4 - Assessment Preparation (Months 10-12):
- Internal audits for both frameworks
- Evidence organization
- Gap remediation
- Assessor selection
Expected savings: 30-40% reduction in total costs compared to pursuing certifications sequentially.
Making Your Final Decision
Use this decision matrix to formalize your choice:
Choose CMMC When:
- ✓ Current or pending DoD contracts exist
- ✓ Handling CUI or FCI data
- ✓ Defense industry supply chain participation
- ✓ Contract explicitly requires CMMC
- ✓ Primary revenue from government sector
Choose SOC 2 When:
- ✓ SaaS or cloud service provider
- ✓ Selling to enterprise B2B customers
- ✓ Prospects requesting security attestation
- ✓ Handling customer confidential data
- ✓ Primary revenue from commercial sector
Choose Both When:
- ✓ Serving government AND commercial markets
- ✓ Strategic expansion across both sectors
- ✓ Budget supports $120K+ unified implementation
- ✓ 12-18 month timeline acceptable
- ✓ Competitive advantage justifies investment
Choose Neither (For Now) When:
- ✓ Serving small business or consumer markets
- ✓ No customer requirements for certification
- ✓ Limited budget (< $50K)
- ✓ Pre-product/market fit startup
- ✓ Basic security hygiene sufficient
Important: “Neither” doesn’t mean “ignore security.” It means formal compliance certification isn’t your current priority. Focus on foundational security controls, privacy compliance, and industry-specific requirements.
Next Steps After Your Decision
If You Chose CMMC:
- Read our Complete CMMC Guide
- Review CMMC Implementation Methodology
- Schedule CMMC consultation for gap assessment
- Budget for C3PAO assessment ($15K-$40K)
- Plan 12-18 month implementation timeline
If You Chose SOC 2:
- Review SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria
- Select Type I vs Type II based on customer requirements
- Interview CPA firms for audit services
- Implement GRC platform for evidence collection
- Plan 9-15 month implementation and audit timeline
If You Chose Both:
- Engage consultant with both CMMC and SOC 2 expertise
- Conduct unified gap assessment across both frameworks
- Prioritize shared control implementation
- Select integrated GRC platform
- Schedule SOC 2 first (faster), then CMMC
- Plan 12-18 month unified timeline
Frequently Asked Questions
Can I change my mind after starting?
Yes, but it’s costly. Switching frameworks mid-implementation wastes the 3-6 months of framework-specific work. Complete your gap assessment thoroughly before committing.
What if my customer accepts ISO 27001 instead?
Some commercial customers accept ISO 27001 as SOC 2 alternative. However, most US enterprise customers specifically require SOC 2. For DoD, CMMC is mandatory regardless of other certifications.
How do I know if I’m handling CUI?
Check your contracts for DFARS 252.204-7012 or DFARS 252.204-7019 clauses. Review contract data requirements. If uncertain, treat as CUI and pursue CMMC to be safe.
Can I do SOC 2 first, then add CMMC later?
Yes, this is often the optimal sequence. SOC 2 Type I/II can be completed in 9-15 months. The security foundation accelerates subsequent CMMC implementation by 30-40%.
What if I can’t afford either right now?
Focus on basic security controls that align with both frameworks: MFA, encryption, logging, incident response, and vulnerability management. Build incrementally toward certification when budget allows.
How often do I need to recertify?
CMMC requires recertification every 3 years. SOC 2 requires annual audits (typically 12-month audit periods). Budget for ongoing compliance costs.
Conclusion
The CMMC vs SOC 2 decision ultimately comes down to where your revenue comes from. Government contracts handling CUI require CMMC. Enterprise commercial customers expect SOC 2. Organizations serving both markets benefit from a unified compliance approach that leverages the 50-60% control overlap.
The worst decision is no decision. Waiting until a contract requires certification means 12-18 months of lost opportunity while you scramble to implement controls. Proactive compliance positioning accelerates sales, strengthens security, and opens market opportunities.
Use this decision framework to evaluate your business profile, customer requirements, and strategic objectives. Make an informed choice based on where you generate revenue and where you’re headed in the next 12-24 months. Then commit fully to proper implementation rather than checkbox compliance.
Your compliance certification should serve your business strategy, not the other way around.
Get Expert Guidance
Still uncertain which path is right for your organization? Our compliance experts help organizations navigate the CMMC vs SOC 2 decision daily.
Schedule a free 30-minute consultation to discuss your specific situation, receive a preliminary gap assessment, and get a customized recommendation based on your business profile.
We’ve helped defense contractors achieve CMMC Level 2 and SaaS companies complete SOC 2 Type II across dozens of industries. Let us help you make the right decision and execute it efficiently.
Turn Technology Challenges Into Business Advantages
Transform technology from a cost center into a growth driver. Schedule a consultation to explore what's possible when your systems work for your business goals.